Quantum Computing in 2026 - Current State, Risks and Opportunities for the Finance Industry

Abstract

Quantum computing has emerged as one of the most significant technological developments of the twenty-first century, with the potential to transform computational capabilities across a wide range of industries. Among the sectors most likely to be affected is financial services, where complex optimisation, simulation, risk modelling, machine learning, and cryptographic security play central roles in organisational operations and decision-making. While quantum computing offers the prospect of substantial computational advantages, it also presents significant risks, particularly to the cryptographic systems that underpin modern financial infrastructure.

This study critically evaluates the current state of quantum computing and assesses its potential opportunities, risks, and strategic implications for the financial services industry. Drawing upon recent academic literature, industry research, and developments in quantum hardware, software, and error-correction technologies, the study examines the maturity of contemporary quantum computing systems and evaluates their potential applications in portfolio optimisation, derivatives pricing, risk management, fraud detection, and financial analytics. In parallel, the study analyses the cybersecurity challenges associated with quantum-enabled cryptanalysis and assesses the role of post-quantum cryptography as the primary mitigation strategy.

The findings suggest that although significant progress has been achieved in logical qubits, fault-tolerant architectures, and quantum error correction, practical large-scale quantum computing remains a medium- to long-term objective. Consequently, many proposed financial applications remain developmental and have yet to demonstrate consistent commercial superiority over advanced classical computing methods. By contrast, the cybersecurity implications of quantum computing are already influencing organisational behaviour, regulatory initiatives, and long-term technology planning. The transition towards post-quantum cryptography therefore represents the most immediate and strategically significant consequence of quantum computing for the financial sector.

The study concludes that the future impact of quantum computing on financial services is likely to occur through a dual-phase transformation. The first phase involves defensive adaptation through cryptographic migration and quantum risk management, while the second involves the gradual adoption of quantum-enhanced computational capabilities as fault-tolerant systems mature. Financial institutions that combine proactive risk mitigation with measured capability development are likely to be best positioned to navigate the opportunities and challenges associated with the emerging quantum era.

Keywords: Quantum Computing, Quantum Finance, Financial Services, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Cybersecurity, Portfolio Optimisation, Risk Management, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing.

1. Introduction

1.1 Background

Quantum computing has emerged as one of the most significant technological developments of the twenty-first century, with the potential to fundamentally alter the computational capabilities available to governments, scientific institutions, and private industry. Unlike classical computers, which process information through binary bits that exist exclusively in a state of 0 or 1, quantum computers utilise quantum bits (qubits) that exploit the principles of superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference. These uniquely quantum mechanical properties enable quantum systems to represent and manipulate information in ways that are fundamentally different from classical computation, creating the possibility of solving certain classes of problems significantly more efficiently than even the most advanced conventional supercomputers (Nielsen and Chuang, 2010).

The conceptual foundations of quantum computing were established through a series of theoretical breakthroughs during the late twentieth century. Among the most influential were Shor’s (1994) quantum algorithm for integer factorisation and discrete logarithms, and Grover’s (1996) quantum search algorithm. These discoveries demonstrated that quantum computers could, in principle, outperform classical systems in specific computational tasks, thereby challenging long-standing assumptions regarding the limits of computational complexity. Consequently, quantum computing evolved from an academic curiosity into a strategically important field of scientific research with implications extending across cryptography, optimisation, simulation, artificial intelligence, and national security.

Over the past decade, the field has undergone a notable transition from theoretical exploration to practical engineering development. Substantial investment from governments, technology firms, and venture capital has accelerated progress in quantum hardware, software, and algorithm design. Organisations such as Google Quantum AI, IBM, Quantinuum, IonQ, Microsoft, and numerous start-ups have pursued competing technological approaches to the construction of scalable quantum systems. Recent advances in quantum error correction, logical qubit stability, and fault-tolerant architectures suggest that the field is gradually progressing towards commercially meaningful quantum computation, although significant engineering and scientific challenges remain unresolved (Acharya et al., 2024; IBM, 2025).

Despite this progress, quantum computing remains an immature technology. Contemporary quantum processors are generally categorised as Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) systems, characterised by limited qubit counts, short coherence times, operational errors, and restricted computational depth (Preskill, 2018). As a result, many of the transformative applications frequently associated with quantum computing remain largely theoretical or confined to experimental demonstrations. Consequently, understanding the realistic capabilities, limitations, and likely developmental trajectory of quantum computing has become increasingly important for organisations seeking to prepare for its future implications.

Among the sectors expected to experience significant impacts from quantum computing, the financial services industry occupies a particularly important position. Modern financial institutions operate in an environment characterised by large-scale optimisation, probabilistic modelling, risk assessment, machine learning, and cryptographic security. These activities frequently require extensive computational resources and involve mathematical problems that exhibit characteristics potentially well suited to quantum algorithms. Portfolio optimisation, derivatives pricing, risk management, fraud detection, and algorithmic trading have therefore emerged as prominent areas of interest within the growing field of quantum finance (Orús et al., 2019).

Research suggests that quantum algorithms may eventually offer computational advantages in several financial applications. Optimisation algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) have been proposed as potential tools for solving complex portfolio allocation problems. Similarly, quantum-enhanced Monte Carlo methods and quantum amplitude estimation may improve the efficiency of derivative pricing and risk modelling frameworks that currently require substantial computational resources (Woerner and Egger, 2019). Although these applications remain largely experimental, they have attracted considerable attention due to the possibility of enhancing decision-making capabilities in highly competitive financial markets.

At the same time, the most immediate and potentially disruptive implications of quantum computing may arise not from computational advantages but from cybersecurity risks. Contemporary financial infrastructure relies extensively on public-key cryptographic systems such as RSA and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), which underpin secure communications, authentication protocols, digital signatures, and transaction verification mechanisms. Shor’s algorithm theoretically enables a sufficiently powerful fault-tolerant quantum computer to compromise these cryptographic systems by efficiently solving mathematical problems that are computationally infeasible for classical computers (Shor, 1994). Such a capability would have profound implications for the confidentiality, integrity, and resilience of global financial systems.

This threat is amplified by the emergence of the so-called “harvest now, decrypt later” risk model, whereby encrypted information intercepted today may be stored and subsequently decrypted once cryptographically relevant quantum computers become available. Given the long-term sensitivity of financial, commercial, and personal data, this risk has elevated quantum computing from a purely technological issue to a strategic concern for regulators, policymakers, and financial institutions worldwide (Mosca, 2018). Consequently, the development and adoption of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) has become a central component of long-term cybersecurity planning.

1.2 Problem Statement

Despite increasing investment, media attention, and technological progress, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the practical implications of quantum computing for the financial services industry. Public discourse often oscillates between highly optimistic projections of revolutionary computational breakthroughs and sceptical assessments that emphasise the significant technical barriers still confronting the field. As a result, financial institutions face considerable challenges in determining the appropriate balance between immediate investment, risk mitigation, capability development, and strategic preparedness.

Furthermore, the potential impacts of quantum computing are inherently asymmetric. While computational benefits are expected to emerge gradually and may initially be restricted to specialised applications, cybersecurity risks associated with future cryptographic disruption require immediate attention due to the long implementation timelines associated with infrastructure migration and cryptographic transformation. This divergence creates strategic complexity for financial institutions seeking to allocate resources effectively while managing technological uncertainty.

1.3 Research Gap

Existing literature has examined quantum computing from multiple perspectives, including hardware development, algorithmic innovation, cryptographic vulnerability, and financial applications. However, much of this research has focused either on the opportunities presented by quantum-enhanced computation or on the cybersecurity risks associated with quantum-enabled cryptanalysis. Comparatively fewer studies have adopted an integrated perspective that simultaneously evaluates both dimensions within the specific context of financial services.

This separation is significant because opportunities and risks are likely to emerge on different timescales and with varying degrees of certainty. Financial institutions must therefore navigate a complex landscape in which long-term computational opportunities coexist with near-term cybersecurity challenges. An integrated assessment is necessary to better understand how organisations should prioritise investment, governance, risk management, and strategic planning in response to quantum technological developments.

1.4 Research Aim

The aim of this study is to critically evaluate the current state of quantum computing and assess its potential opportunities, risks, and strategic implications for the financial services industry.

1.5 Research Objectives

To achieve this aim, the study pursues the following objectives:

1. To examine the current technological maturity of quantum computing, including developments in hardware, software, and algorithm design.

2. To evaluate potential applications of quantum computing within financial services, particularly in portfolio optimisation, derivatives pricing, risk management, and machine learning.

3. To assess the cybersecurity, operational, and systemic risks associated with quantum technological development.

4. To analyse the role of post-quantum cryptography as a mitigation strategy for emerging quantum threats.

5. To identify the strategic implications of quantum computing for financial institutions and assess appropriate approaches to long-term preparedness.

1.6 Research Questions

The study is guided by the following primary research question:

How is quantum computing likely to affect the financial services industry over the coming decades?

To address this question, the study considers the following secondary research questions:

1. What is the current state of quantum computing development?

2. Which financial applications appear most likely to benefit from quantum computing?

3. What risks does quantum computing pose to financial institutions and market infrastructure?

4. How effective are current post-quantum cryptographic initiatives in addressing quantum-related cybersecurity threats?

5. What strategic actions should financial institutions undertake to prepare for a quantum-enabled future?

1.7 Structure of the Study

The remainder of this paper is organised as follows.

Chapter 2 reviews the current state of quantum computing, examining developments in hardware architectures, software platforms, and algorithmic research. Chapter 3 explores potential opportunities within the financial services industry, focusing on optimisation, pricing, risk management, fraud detection, and strategic positioning. Chapter 4 evaluates the principal risks associated with quantum computing, including cryptographic vulnerability, systemic financial risk, competitive asymmetries, and governance challenges. Chapter 5 analyses the emergence of post-quantum cryptography and assesses the readiness of financial institutions for quantum-related cybersecurity transitions. Chapter 6 considers future developments and presents a forward-looking assessment of quantum computing's likely trajectory within finance. Finally, Chapter 7 summarises the key findings and outlines the broader implications of the study.

1.8 Chapter Summary

Quantum computing has progressed from a theoretical scientific concept to an emerging technological paradigm with potentially far-reaching implications for financial services. While substantial uncertainty remains regarding the timeline and extent of practical quantum advantage, recent advances in hardware development and quantum error correction have strengthened expectations that quantum technologies will play an increasingly important role in future computational ecosystems. For financial institutions, this evolution presents a dual challenge: preparing for potentially transformative computational opportunities while simultaneously addressing the significant cybersecurity risks associated with quantum-enabled cryptanalysis.

Given these competing dynamics, an evidence-based assessment of both opportunities and risks is essential. The following chapter therefore examines the current state of quantum computing technology and evaluates the extent to which recent developments have advanced the field towards commercially meaningful applications.

2. Current State of Quantum Computing

2.1 Introduction

The current state of quantum computing is characterised by a transition from experimental demonstrations toward the early foundations of fault-tolerant quantum computation. Although quantum computing remains in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, recent advances in logical qubits, quantum error correction, and scalable architectures have altered perceptions regarding the feasibility of large-scale quantum systems. Rather than focusing solely on increases in physical qubit counts, contemporary research increasingly emphasises logical performance, error suppression, and fault-tolerant operation as the key indicators of technological maturity.

Consequently, evaluating the state of quantum computing requires consideration of both hardware and software developments, together with an assessment of the extent to which recent achievements address the fundamental challenges of noise, decoherence, scalability, and algorithmic practicality. While significant progress has been achieved, important limitations remain, and the timeline for commercially transformative quantum computing continues to be uncertain.

2.2 Hardware Progress

2.2.1 From Physical Qubits to Logical Qubits

Historically, progress in quantum computing was measured primarily through increases in physical qubit counts. However, this metric has become increasingly insufficient as researchers have recognised that useful quantum computation depends not on the number of physical qubits alone but on the ability to construct stable logical qubits capable of supporting fault-tolerant operations.

The central challenge arises from the inherent fragility of quantum information. Qubits are highly susceptible to environmental interactions, operational imperfections, and decoherence, all of which introduce errors into quantum computations. Unlike classical computing systems, where error correction is comparatively straightforward, quantum error correction requires information to be encoded across many physical qubits in order to protect a single logical qubit.

As a result, recent research has increasingly focused on demonstrating that logical error rates decrease as quantum error-correcting codes scale. This milestone, commonly referred to as operating below the fault-tolerance threshold, has long been regarded as a prerequisite for practical quantum computing (Preskill, 2018).

One of the most significant developments in this area was Google's demonstration of below-threshold quantum error correction using its Willow processor. Researchers showed that logical error rates could be reduced as code distance increased, providing experimental evidence that larger error-correcting codes can outperform smaller ones despite requiring additional physical resources. This achievement represents an important validation of the theoretical foundations underlying scalable fault-tolerant quantum computation and is widely regarded as one of the most significant advances in the field since the introduction of modern quantum error correction theory.

Importantly, this result should not be interpreted as evidence that large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computing has been achieved. Rather, it demonstrates that the fundamental scaling relationship required for future fault-tolerant architectures appears achievable under realistic experimental conditions. Considerable engineering challenges remain before such systems can be expanded to the millions of physical qubits likely required for cryptographically relevant or commercially transformative applications.

2.2.2 Competing Hardware Architectures

The contemporary quantum computing landscape is characterised by several competing technological approaches, each reflecting different trade-offs between scalability, fidelity, connectivity, operational speed, and engineering complexity.

2.2.2.1 Superconducting Qubits

Superconducting qubits remain the most commercially mature quantum computing platform and continue to be pursued by organisations such as IBM and Google Quantum AI. Their primary advantages include rapid gate operations, compatibility with established semiconductor fabrication techniques, and extensive software ecosystem support.

Recent advances in superconducting systems have focused less on increasing qubit counts and more on improving logical performance through enhanced calibration, error mitigation, and error correction. Google's Willow processor and IBM's modular quantum computing roadmap illustrate this shift towards fault-tolerant architectures rather than purely hardware-scale metrics.

However, superconducting systems continue to face challenges related to cryogenic requirements, fabrication variability, crosstalk, and error-correction overhead. As systems scale, these factors may impose increasingly significant engineering constraints.

2.2.2.2 Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing

Trapped-ion systems, developed by organisations including Quantinuum and IonQ, offer some of the highest gate fidelities currently available. Their long coherence times and all-to-all qubit connectivity make them particularly attractive for error-corrected computation.

Recent demonstrations have achieved logical operations with error-corrected qubits exhibiting performance superior to their physical counterparts, an important milestone commonly described as "better-than-break-even" performance. Such results suggest that trapped-ion architectures may remain highly competitive despite generally slower gate speeds compared with superconducting approaches.

Nevertheless, challenges associated with scaling large trapped-ion systems remain significant, particularly regarding control complexity and operational throughput.

2.2.2.3 Neutral Atom Architectures

Among the most notable developments of the past two years has been the rapid emergence of neutral atom quantum computing as a serious contender for large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation.

Researchers demonstrated a programmable logical quantum processor operating with hundreds of physical qubits arranged in reconfigurable atom arrays. The architecture combines high-fidelity operations, arbitrary connectivity, logical gate operations, and fault-tolerant protocols within a scalable framework. Experimental demonstrations have shown logical processors operating with up to 280 physical qubits and increasingly sophisticated logical operations.

Subsequent research has extended these capabilities by demonstrating key components of universal fault-tolerant architectures, including repeated quantum error correction, logical entanglement, transversal gates, and large-scale logical teleportation. These developments suggest that neutral atom systems may possess unique advantages in scalability due to their ability to manipulate large arrays of qubits with flexible connectivity.

Although still at an early stage, neutral atom architectures have increasingly shifted from experimental curiosities to credible candidates for large-scale quantum computing.

2.2.2.4 Topological Quantum Computing

Topological quantum computing remains the most theoretically attractive yet experimentally uncertain architecture. The approach seeks to encode information within exotic quantum states that are intrinsically resistant to certain forms of error.

If realised successfully, topological qubits could substantially reduce the error-correction overhead currently required by other platforms. However, experimental evidence remains comparatively limited, and substantial scientific challenges must still be overcome before topological approaches can be evaluated against more mature architectures.

Consequently, while topological computing continues to attract attention, its commercial prospects remain more speculative than those of superconducting, trapped-ion, or neutral atom systems.

2.2.3 The Remaining Scalability Challenge

Despite substantial progress, the gap between current capabilities and practical large-scale quantum computing remains considerable. Contemporary systems typically operate with hundreds or, in some cases, low thousands of physical qubits. By contrast, estimates suggest that applications such as breaking RSA-2048 encryption through Shor's algorithm may require millions of physical qubits operating with extremely low logical error rates (Gidney and Ekerå, 2021).

Recent advances have therefore altered the trajectory of the field without eliminating its central challenge. Quantum error correction appears increasingly feasible, but scalable fault-tolerant quantum computation remains an engineering problem of exceptional complexity.

Accordingly, the current state of hardware development is best characterised as a transition from proof-of-concept demonstrations toward early fault-tolerant architectures rather than the imminent arrival of universal quantum computing.

2.3 Software and Algorithmic Progress

While hardware development often receives greater public attention, advances in software and algorithms have been equally important in shaping the contemporary quantum computing landscape.

Major software ecosystems—including Qiskit, Cirq, Azure Quantum, PennyLane, and Quantinuum's development frameworks—have significantly reduced barriers to experimentation and algorithm development. These platforms increasingly support both quantum hardware and high-fidelity simulators, facilitating algorithm research independent of hardware constraints.

Importantly, recent research has shifted away from expectations of near-term universal quantum advantage and towards hybrid quantum-classical computation. This approach treats quantum processors as specialised accelerators integrated into broader computational workflows rather than standalone replacements for classical computing systems.

Current algorithmic research can broadly be categorised into optimisation, simulation, machine learning, and cryptanalysis.

2.3.1 Optimisation

Optimisation remains one of the most commercially relevant areas of quantum algorithm research. Real-world optimisation problems frequently involve exponentially large search spaces that challenge conventional computational approaches.

Algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA), Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), and quantum annealing frameworks continue to attract substantial research attention. Their appeal lies in their compatibility with near-term hardware and their potential applicability to logistics, energy systems, manufacturing, and finance.

However, despite extensive research activity, empirical demonstrations of consistent quantum advantage in practical optimisation tasks remain limited. Contemporary evidence suggests that hybrid quantum-classical approaches currently represent the most realistic pathway towards commercial value.

2.3.2 Quantum Simulation

Quantum simulation remains the application area for which the theoretical case for quantum advantage is strongest. Because quantum systems naturally represent other quantum systems, quantum computers may eventually outperform classical supercomputers in modelling molecular interactions, chemical reactions, and complex physical systems.

Applications in materials science, pharmaceutical development, energy research, and financial scenario modelling continue to drive investment in this domain. While practical demonstrations remain limited by hardware constraints, simulation is widely regarded as one of the most likely sources of early fault-tolerant quantum advantage.

2.3.3 Quantum Machine Learning

Quantum machine learning (QML) has become one of the fastest-growing research areas within quantum computing. Proposed approaches include quantum neural networks, quantum kernels, variational classifiers, and hybrid learning architectures.

Despite substantial academic interest, evidence for practical quantum advantage remains inconclusive. Current research suggests that quantum machine learning is unlikely to replace classical artificial intelligence systems in the foreseeable future. Instead, quantum methods are increasingly viewed as specialised tools that may enhance specific computational bottlenecks within broader machine learning workflows.

Consequently, the future of QML is likely to be characterised by augmentation rather than replacement.

2.3.4 Cryptanalysis

Cryptanalysis remains the most strategically significant quantum application from a policy and risk-management perspective.

Shor's algorithm demonstrates that sufficiently powerful fault-tolerant quantum computers could efficiently solve the integer factorisation and discrete logarithm problems underpinning RSA and elliptic curve cryptography. Similarly, Grover's algorithm provides a quadratic speed-up for unstructured search problems, effectively reducing the security margin of symmetric encryption systems.

Current hardware remains far from implementing these algorithms at cryptographically relevant scales. Nevertheless, the existence of theoretically viable attacks has already triggered global investment in post-quantum cryptography and long-term cybersecurity migration strategies. Consequently, cryptanalysis exerts influence on financial institutions today despite the absence of practical quantum attacks.

2.4 Critical Evaluation of the Current State of the Field

Taken collectively, recent developments indicate that quantum computing has progressed beyond purely theoretical research and entered a phase of early engineering validation. Advances in logical qubits, quantum error correction, and fault-tolerant architectures have addressed several challenges previously regarded as major barriers to scalability.

However, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the timeline required to convert these scientific achievements into economically meaningful computational advantage. Many highly publicised demonstrations remain benchmark-specific and do not necessarily translate into broad commercial utility. Furthermore, resource estimates for large-scale applications continue to imply requirements measured in millions of physical qubits and extensive error-correction infrastructure.

Consequently, the most accurate assessment of the field is neither one of imminent technological revolution nor one of unfulfilled promise. Rather, quantum computing currently occupies an intermediate position in which foundational scientific feasibility has become increasingly credible, while practical large-scale deployment remains a medium- to long-term objective.

The significance of this distinction is particularly important for financial institutions. The evidence suggests that quantum computing should be viewed neither as an immediate computational solution nor as a distant speculative technology. Instead, it represents an emerging strategic capability whose future impact will depend on the interaction between hardware scalability, algorithmic innovation, economic viability, and regulatory adaptation.

3. Opportunities in the Finance Industry

3.1 Introduction

The financial services industry has emerged as one of the sectors most frequently identified as a potential beneficiary of quantum computing. Unlike many industries where computational demands are constrained by physical processes or operational bottlenecks, financial institutions routinely confront problems involving optimisation, simulation, probabilistic forecasting, and large-scale data analysis. These activities often require substantial computational resources and involve mathematical structures that may be amenable to quantum-enhanced approaches (Egger et al., 2020; Zhou, 2025).

The attraction of quantum computing within finance stems from its theoretical ability to process certain classes of computational problems more efficiently than classical systems. In principle, quantum algorithms could improve the speed and quality of decision-making across portfolio construction, derivatives pricing, risk management, machine learning, and fraud detection. However, the extent to which these benefits can be realised remains uncertain. Many proposed applications remain theoretical, while empirical demonstrations of sustained commercial quantum advantage are currently limited.

Consequently, a critical assessment of opportunities in finance requires distinguishing between theoretical potential and practical feasibility. This chapter evaluates the principal domains in which quantum computing may create value, assesses the current state of evidence supporting these applications, and examines the conditions under which meaningful quantum advantage may emerge.

3.2 Portfolio Optimisation

Portfolio optimisation is widely regarded as one of the most promising financial applications of quantum computing, with recent research highlighting the potential for quantum algorithms to improve solution quality in high-dimensional optimisation problems encountered within institutional asset management (Zhou, 2025). Since the publication of Markowitz's (1952) Modern Portfolio Theory, portfolio construction has been formulated as an optimisation problem involving the allocation of capital across assets while balancing expected returns against risk.

As portfolios increase in size and complexity, the number of possible asset combinations expands exponentially. Additional constraints relating to liquidity, transaction costs, regulatory requirements, diversification mandates, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives further increase computational complexity. Consequently, large-scale optimisation often requires approximation methods rather than exact solutions.

Quantum computing has attracted attention because many portfolio allocation problems can be reformulated as combinatorial optimisation tasks. Algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA), quantum annealing methods, and variational optimisation approaches have been proposed as mechanisms for exploring large solution spaces more efficiently than classical heuristics (Farhi et al., 2014; Venturelli and Kondratyev, 2019).

Research using quantum annealers has demonstrated the feasibility of solving constrained portfolio optimisation problems under experimental conditions. However, current evidence remains mixed. While certain benchmark problems have shown encouraging results, large-scale commercial superiority over state-of-the-art classical optimisation techniques has yet to be demonstrated consistently (Orús et al., 2019).

From a practical perspective, the most likely pathway toward quantum-enhanced portfolio management is through hybrid quantum-classical systems in which quantum processors act as specialised optimisation accelerators embedded within broader investment workflows. Consequently, portfolio optimisation represents a plausible medium-term opportunity rather than an immediate source of industry-wide disruption.

3.3 Derivatives Pricing and Monte Carlo Simulation

A second area frequently identified as a candidate for quantum advantage is derivatives pricing and financial simulation.

Modern financial institutions rely heavily on Monte Carlo methods to estimate the value of complex financial instruments and assess future risk exposures. These simulations often require the generation and analysis of millions of scenarios, particularly when pricing path-dependent derivatives or evaluating portfolio-wide risk positions.

Quantum computing has attracted significant interest in this domain due to the development of quantum amplitude estimation (QAE), which offers a theoretical quadratic speed-up over classical Monte Carlo approaches (Brassard et al., 2000). Under ideal conditions, QAE may reduce the number of samples required to achieve a desired level of precision, thereby accelerating computationally intensive valuation processes.

Montanaro (2017) demonstrated that quantum-enhanced Monte Carlo methods possess strong theoretical foundations for achieving computational speed improvements. Subsequent work by Woerner and Egger (2019) explored the application of these techniques within derivatives pricing and risk analysis frameworks.

Nevertheless, substantial challenges remain. Current quantum hardware lacks the scale and fault tolerance necessary to implement many of these algorithms effectively in real-world financial environments. Furthermore, practical implementation requires efficient methods for encoding complex market data into quantum states, a challenge that remains an active area of research.

Despite these limitations, derivatives pricing is widely considered one of the strongest long-term candidates for quantum advantage because the theoretical benefits are supported by rigorous mathematical analysis rather than speculative assumptions regarding future algorithm development.

3.4 Risk Management and Stress Testing

Risk management represents another area where quantum computing may eventually generate substantial value.

Financial institutions routinely conduct scenario analysis, stress testing, value-at-risk (VaR) calculations, expected shortfall estimation, and liquidity assessments. These activities require the modelling of large numbers of interacting variables under conditions of uncertainty. As financial systems become increasingly interconnected, the computational demands associated with risk management continue to increase.

Quantum-enhanced simulation techniques may improve the efficiency of evaluating large and complex probability distributions, potentially enabling more sophisticated risk modelling and scenario analysis frameworks within financial institutions (Zhou, 2025). In principle, this could allow institutions to analyse a broader range of scenarios, incorporate more sophisticated models, and improve the responsiveness of risk assessment frameworks.

The potential significance of these improvements extends beyond individual firms. More accurate and timely risk modelling may contribute to greater financial stability by enabling earlier identification of systemic vulnerabilities and emerging market stresses.

However, it is important to recognise that improvements in computational speed do not automatically translate into better risk management outcomes. Model assumptions, data quality, behavioural factors, and governance frameworks remain critical determinants of decision quality. Consequently, quantum computing should be viewed as a potential enhancement to existing risk-management processes rather than a replacement for sound risk governance.

3.5 Quantum Machine Learning and Financial Analytics

Artificial intelligence and machine learning have become increasingly important components of modern financial services. Applications include credit scoring, fraud detection, customer segmentation, algorithmic trading, anti-money laundering systems, and predictive analytics.

Quantum machine learning (QML) seeks to combine quantum computation with machine learning methodologies in order to improve pattern recognition, classification, optimisation, and predictive modelling (Biamonte et al., 2017; Schuld and Petruccione, 2021).

Several proposed approaches, including quantum kernel methods, variational quantum classifiers, and quantum neural networks, have attracted significant academic attention. Theoretically, these methods may offer advantages when analysing high-dimensional datasets or identifying complex relationships that are difficult to capture using classical algorithms.

Within finance, potential applications include:

• Fraud detection

• Credit risk assessment

• Customer behaviour modelling

• Market forecasting

• Algorithmic trading

Despite considerable enthusiasm, empirical evidence supporting practical quantum advantage remains limited. Many proposed QML applications have only been tested on small datasets or simulated environments. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that classical machine learning systems continue to outperform quantum alternatives across many commercially relevant tasks.

Consequently, the future of quantum machine learning is likely to involve selective augmentation of classical systems rather than wholesale replacement. Significant uncertainty remains regarding whether QML will ultimately become one of the major drivers of financial transformation or remain a specialised research domain.

3.6 Fraud Detection and Financial Crime Prevention

The increasing sophistication of financial crime has intensified demand for advanced analytical tools capable of detecting unusual behaviour across large transaction networks.

Fraud detection systems typically rely on identifying anomalies within high-volume datasets containing complex and evolving behavioural patterns. Quantum-enhanced machine learning and graph-analysis techniques have been proposed as potential mechanisms for improving the detection of fraudulent transactions and suspicious network activity.

Theoretically, quantum algorithms may offer advantages in pattern recognition and optimisation tasks relevant to anti-money laundering (AML), know-your-customer (KYC), and fraud detection systems. Such improvements could assist institutions in reducing false positives while improving detection accuracy.

However, similar to quantum machine learning more broadly, these applications remain largely conceptual. There is currently limited empirical evidence demonstrating that quantum systems outperform advanced classical fraud detection platforms in operational environments. Accordingly, this area should be regarded as a longer-term opportunity contingent upon both hardware maturity and algorithmic progress.

3.7 Strategic and Competitive Advantages

Beyond specific technical applications, quantum computing may generate broader strategic opportunities for financial institutions.

Historically, technological innovations have often produced temporary competitive advantages for early adopters. Institutions capable of accessing superior computational resources may achieve improvements in pricing efficiency, optimisation quality, trading execution, and risk management. In highly competitive financial markets, even relatively small computational advantages can generate significant economic value.

Consequently, many leading financial institutions have already established quantum research partnerships, pilot programmes, and innovation laboratories despite the absence of immediate commercial applications. Organisations including JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, and BBVA have invested in quantum research initiatives aimed at developing internal expertise and evaluating future use cases (Egger et al., 2020).

Importantly, the primary value of these investments may currently lie less in immediate technological returns and more in strategic optionality. Developing organisational knowledge, talent pipelines, and ecosystem partnerships may position institutions to respond more effectively as the technology matures.

3.8 Critical Evaluation of Financial Opportunities

Although quantum computing has generated substantial interest within financial services, the current evidence suggests that expectations should remain measured.

Many proposed applications possess strong theoretical foundations, particularly in optimisation and simulation. Portfolio optimisation, derivatives pricing, and risk modelling appear to represent the most credible long-term opportunities because they align closely with areas where quantum algorithms offer mathematically demonstrable advantages.

In contrast, applications involving quantum machine learning, fraud detection, and predictive analytics remain comparatively speculative. While promising research continues to emerge, empirical evidence demonstrating consistent commercial superiority over advanced classical methods remains limited.

A further consideration is that financial institutions already possess access to highly sophisticated classical computing infrastructure. Any future quantum solution must therefore outperform not only conventional computing but also decades of optimisation embedded within modern financial technology systems.

Consequently, the most realistic scenario is not one of wholesale technological replacement but rather the gradual emergence of hybrid quantum-classical workflows. Under this model, quantum processors would be deployed selectively for computationally intensive sub-problems while classical systems continue to perform the majority of operational tasks.

Overall, the evidence suggests that quantum computing offers genuine opportunities for financial transformation, particularly in optimisation and simulation. However, these opportunities are likely to emerge incrementally over an extended time horizon and will depend heavily on continued progress in fault-tolerant quantum computing, algorithm development, and economic scalability.

3.9 Chapter Summary

Quantum computing presents a range of potential opportunities across the financial services industry, particularly in portfolio optimisation, derivatives pricing, risk management, and advanced analytical processes. Among these applications, optimisation and simulation currently possess the strongest theoretical and empirical foundations for future quantum advantage.

Nevertheless, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the timing and magnitude of these benefits. Most proposed applications remain dependent on future advances in fault-tolerant quantum computing and have not yet demonstrated sustained commercial superiority over classical alternatives. As a result, quantum computing should currently be viewed as an emerging strategic capability rather than an immediate source of competitive transformation.

The next chapter examines the corresponding risks associated with quantum computing, including cybersecurity threats, operational challenges, systemic implications, and the broader governance issues that financial institutions must address as the technology continues to evolve.

4. Risks to the Finance Industry

4.1 Introduction

While much of the discussion surrounding quantum computing focuses on its potential to generate computational advantages, the technology also introduces a range of significant risks for financial institutions. Unlike many emerging technologies, the risks associated with quantum computing are not limited to operational uncertainty or implementation challenges. Rather, they extend to the foundations of cybersecurity, market infrastructure, financial stability, and strategic competitiveness.

The financial services industry is particularly vulnerable because modern financial systems depend heavily on cryptographic security, digital trust, complex technological infrastructure, and interconnected global networks. Consequently, even before large-scale quantum computing becomes commercially viable, the possibility of future quantum capabilities has already begun influencing risk management strategies, regulatory frameworks, and cybersecurity investment decisions.

Importantly, the risks associated with quantum computing are not distributed evenly across time. Certain risks—particularly those relating to cryptographic vulnerability—require immediate attention despite the absence of cryptographically relevant quantum computers today. Other risks are likely to emerge gradually as quantum technologies become more accessible and economically viable. Understanding this distinction is essential for developing effective institutional responses.

This chapter critically evaluates the principal risks quantum computing poses to the financial services industry, including cybersecurity threats, operational risks, systemic implications, competitive asymmetries, and governance challenges.

4.2 Cryptographic Risk and the Threat to Financial Security

4.2.1 Dependence on Public-Key Cryptography

The most frequently cited risk associated with quantum computing concerns its potential impact on contemporary cryptographic systems.

Modern financial institutions rely extensively on public-key cryptography to secure communications, authenticate users, verify transactions, protect sensitive information, and maintain trust within digital financial ecosystems. Widely deployed systems such as RSA and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) underpin critical infrastructure across banking, payment networks, capital markets, and regulatory systems (Diffie and Hellman, 1976; Rivest, Shamir and Adleman, 1978).

The security of these cryptographic schemes depends on the computational difficulty of mathematical problems such as integer factorisation and discrete logarithms. Under classical computing assumptions, these problems are considered computationally infeasible to solve within practical timescales.

However, Shor's (1994) quantum algorithm demonstrated that a sufficiently powerful fault-tolerant quantum computer could solve these problems efficiently. As a result, many cryptographic systems currently relied upon throughout the global financial system would become vulnerable.

The significance of this threat extends beyond individual organisations. Public-key cryptography forms part of the foundational trust architecture of modern finance. Consequently, widespread cryptographic compromise would represent a systemic rather than merely organisational risk.

4.2.2 The "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" Problem

A particularly important aspect of quantum risk is the emergence of the so-called "harvest now, decrypt later" threat model.

Under this scenario, malicious actors collect encrypted data today with the expectation that future quantum computers will eventually possess the capability to decrypt it. Although the information may remain secure under current computational assumptions, its confidentiality could be compromised retrospectively once cryptographically relevant quantum systems become available (Mosca, 2018).

This issue is especially relevant for financial institutions because many categories of information retain long-term value. Examples include:

• Customer financial records

• Strategic business information

• Regulatory filings

• Long-term investment data

• Government and sovereign financial communications

Consequently, organisations cannot simply wait until practical quantum computers emerge before responding. By the time quantum capabilities become available, previously intercepted information may already be exposed.

This temporal asymmetry distinguishes quantum cybersecurity risk from many conventional cyber threats and explains why quantum preparedness has become an immediate strategic concern despite technological uncertainty.

4.2.3 Transition Risk

The challenge facing financial institutions is compounded by the complexity of migrating cryptographic infrastructure.

Large financial organisations often operate highly interconnected technology environments consisting of legacy systems, third-party platforms, cloud services, payment networks, and regulatory reporting systems. Identifying all cryptographic dependencies within these ecosystems is itself a substantial undertaking.

The migration towards post-quantum cryptography therefore represents one of the largest technological transformation projects currently confronting the financial sector, requiring cryptographic discovery, inventory management, standards development, and large-scale infrastructure replacement (Chen et al., 2016).

Consequently, one of the most immediate quantum-related risks is not necessarily quantum attack itself but rather the risk of failing to complete cryptographic migration before such capabilities emerge.

4.3 Operational and Technological Risks

Beyond cybersecurity concerns, quantum computing introduces a variety of operational risks associated with technological adoption.

Historically, financial institutions have encountered significant challenges when implementing new technologies, particularly those involving highly specialised expertise, uncertain performance characteristics, and evolving standards. Quantum computing exhibits all of these characteristics simultaneously.

The technology remains technically complex, rapidly changing, and dependent upon specialised skills that remain scarce globally. Consequently, organisations pursuing early quantum initiatives may face substantial implementation risks, including:

• Misallocation of investment resources

• Unrealistic expectations regarding technological maturity

• Vendor dependency

• Talent shortages

• Project failure and sunk costs

These risks are amplified by the current absence of universally accepted standards for quantum software development, performance benchmarking, and operational governance.

Furthermore, many highly publicised claims regarding quantum advantage remain based on laboratory benchmarks rather than commercially validated outcomes. As a result, organisations may be exposed to strategic decision-making based on overly optimistic assumptions regarding future capabilities.

4.4 Model Risk and Algorithmic Uncertainty

Financial institutions increasingly rely on quantitative models to support decision-making across trading, investment management, risk assessment, and regulatory compliance.

The introduction of quantum algorithms creates new forms of model risk that extend beyond traditional validation frameworks. Quantum systems frequently involve probabilistic outputs, hybrid computational architectures, and optimisation processes that may be difficult to interpret using conventional approaches.

This creates several challenges.

First, model transparency may decrease as quantum-enhanced systems become more complex. Regulatory frameworks often require institutions to demonstrate how decisions are generated and validated. Quantum algorithms may complicate these requirements.

Second, verification becomes increasingly difficult as quantum systems scale. In some cases, independently confirming that a quantum algorithm has produced the optimal solution may itself be computationally challenging (Bouland et al., 2020).

Third, there remains uncertainty regarding the robustness of many proposed financial quantum algorithms under realistic market conditions. Performance demonstrated within simplified experimental environments may not translate directly into real-world financial applications.

Consequently, model risk governance is likely to become an increasingly important component of future quantum adoption strategies.

4.5 Competitive and Market Structure Risks

Quantum computing may also alter competitive dynamics within financial markets.

Historically, financial innovation has often produced asymmetrical benefits for early adopters. Institutions possessing superior analytical capabilities frequently gain advantages in pricing, execution, forecasting, and risk management.

If meaningful quantum advantage emerges, access to advanced quantum infrastructure may become concentrated among a relatively small number of organisations possessing the resources necessary to invest in specialised hardware, expertise, and research partnerships.

Such concentration could produce several risks:

• Increased barriers to market entry

• Greater competitive inequality

• Reduced market contestability

• Concentration of technological power

Large multinational banks may be better positioned than smaller institutions to exploit emerging quantum capabilities. This could widen existing competitive disparities and potentially contribute to increased concentration within segments of the financial services industry.

While such outcomes remain speculative, they warrant consideration because technological concentration has historically influenced market structure across numerous industries.

4.6 Systemic Risk and Financial Stability

From a regulatory perspective, the most significant long-term concern may be the potential impact of quantum computing on financial stability.

Financial systems operate as highly interconnected networks. Consequently, disruptions affecting major institutions or critical infrastructure providers can propagate rapidly across markets and jurisdictions.

Several systemic risk pathways can be identified.

The first involves cryptographic disruption. A widespread failure of digital trust mechanisms could affect payment systems, securities settlement processes, interbank communications, and market infrastructure.

The second concerns asymmetric technological adoption. If quantum capabilities become concentrated among a limited number of institutions, disparities in analytical capacity could potentially influence market efficiency, liquidity, and competitive behaviour.

The third relates to technological interdependence. Increasing reliance on a small number of quantum hardware providers, cloud service providers, or specialist technology firms could create new forms of concentration risk within financial ecosystems.

Although these scenarios remain largely hypothetical, regulators have increasingly recognised that quantum computing possesses implications extending beyond individual institutions and into the broader domain of systemic resilience.

4.7 Regulatory and Governance Challenges

Quantum computing presents substantial governance challenges for both firms and regulators.

Regulatory frameworks governing financial technology have historically evolved more slowly than technological innovation. Quantum computing is unlikely to be an exception.

Several questions remain unresolved:

• How should quantum-related risks be measured and disclosed?

• What constitutes adequate quantum preparedness?

• How should quantum models be validated?

• What standards should govern quantum cloud services?

• How should institutions demonstrate compliance during cryptographic migration?

Addressing these issues will require collaboration between regulators, technology providers, standards bodies, and financial institutions.

Additionally, boards and senior executives face governance challenges associated with strategic uncertainty. Decisions regarding quantum investment, risk mitigation, talent acquisition, and partnership development must often be made despite incomplete information regarding future technological trajectories.

As a result, quantum governance increasingly resembles a strategic resilience challenge rather than a purely technical issue.

4.8 Critical Evaluation of Quantum Risk

A critical examination of the evidence suggests that quantum computing presents an unusual risk profile compared with most emerging technologies.

In many technological transitions, opportunities emerge before major risks materialise. Quantum computing appears likely to follow the opposite pattern. The cybersecurity risks associated with future cryptographic disruption are already influencing organisational behaviour despite the absence of practical quantum attacks, whereas many computational opportunities remain dependent upon future advances in fault-tolerant hardware.

This asymmetry has important implications for financial institutions. It suggests that quantum preparedness should initially be viewed as a risk-management challenge rather than a technology-adoption initiative.

Furthermore, the most significant risks are not limited to technical vulnerabilities. Organisational readiness, governance quality, migration capability, and strategic decision-making may ultimately determine whether institutions navigate the transition successfully.

Consequently, the central challenge facing financial institutions is not predicting the precise arrival date of large-scale quantum computing. Rather, it is developing sufficient resilience to manage uncertainty across a prolonged technological transition.

4.9 Chapter Summary

Quantum computing presents a diverse range of risks for the financial services industry, extending far beyond its well-known implications for cryptography. Although the potential compromise of public-key cryptographic systems remains the most immediate and strategically significant concern, additional risks arise from operational complexity, model uncertainty, competitive asymmetries, systemic vulnerabilities, and governance challenges.

Importantly, many of these risks require action before practical quantum computers become available. The long implementation timelines associated with cryptographic migration, organisational preparedness, and regulatory adaptation mean that institutions must respond proactively despite uncertainty regarding future technological developments.

The evidence therefore suggests that the initial impact of quantum computing on financial services is likely to be defensive rather than transformative. Before financial institutions can fully exploit potential computational advantages, they must first address the substantial risks posed by the technology. The next chapter examines the primary mechanism for mitigating these risks: post-quantum cryptography and institutional preparedness strategies.

5. Post-Quantum Cryptography and Financial Readiness

5.1 Introduction

The emergence of quantum computing has fundamentally altered long-term assumptions regarding cryptographic security. While large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computers capable of breaking contemporary encryption systems do not yet exist, the theoretical feasibility of quantum-enabled cryptanalysis has transformed cybersecurity from a purely technical concern into a strategic issue for governments, regulators, and financial institutions.

For the financial services industry, this challenge is particularly significant. Modern financial systems depend extensively on cryptographic mechanisms to secure transactions, authenticate users, protect sensitive information, and maintain trust across digital networks. Consequently, the possibility that future quantum computers may compromise widely deployed public-key cryptographic systems presents a risk that extends beyond individual organisations to the broader stability of financial infrastructure.

In response, substantial international effort has been directed towards the development and deployment of post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Unlike quantum cryptography, which relies on quantum mechanical principles, PQC consists of classical cryptographic algorithms designed to remain secure against attacks from both classical and quantum computers.

This chapter examines the emergence of post-quantum cryptography, evaluates its role in mitigating quantum-related risks, and assesses the readiness of financial institutions to navigate the transition towards a post-quantum security environment.

5.2 The Quantum Threat to Contemporary Cryptography

5.2.1 Why Existing Cryptography Is Vulnerable

The majority of contemporary public-key cryptographic systems derive their security from mathematical problems that are computationally infeasible for classical computers to solve within practical timescales.

RSA relies on the difficulty of integer factorisation, while elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) depends upon the computational complexity of discrete logarithm problems (Rivest, Shamir and Adleman, 1978). For decades, these assumptions have provided the foundation for digital trust across banking systems, payment networks, financial exchanges, and regulatory infrastructure.

However, Shor's (1994) algorithm demonstrated that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could solve both factorisation and discrete logarithm problems efficiently. The implications of this vulnerability have been extensively examined within the post-quantum cryptography literature, which identifies RSA and ECC as among the most significant cryptographic systems requiring replacement in a quantum-enabled future (Chen et al., 2016).

Importantly, the vulnerability is not confined to future communications. Information encrypted today may remain vulnerable if intercepted and stored for future decryption. Consequently, organisations must address quantum risk before practical quantum computers become available.

5.2.2 The Strategic Nature of Quantum Cyber Risk

Unlike conventional cybersecurity threats, quantum risk is characterised by profound uncertainty regarding timing but relatively high confidence regarding eventual impact.

Most cyber threats emerge unexpectedly and require reactive responses. Quantum cryptographic disruption differs because its underlying mechanism is already understood. The principal uncertainty concerns when sufficiently powerful quantum systems will become available rather than whether the vulnerability exists.

This distinction creates a unique strategic challenge. Financial institutions must make investment and migration decisions today despite uncertainty regarding the timeline of future quantum capabilities.

Mosca (2018) proposed that organisations should evaluate quantum risk through a simple framework involving three variables:

• The shelf life of information

• The migration time required for cryptographic replacement

• The estimated arrival of quantum threats

Where the first two variables exceed the third, immediate action becomes necessary.

For many financial institutions, this condition may already apply.

5.3 Post-Quantum Cryptography

5.3.1 Definition and Principles

Post-quantum cryptography refers to cryptographic algorithms designed to remain secure against both classical and quantum attacks.

Unlike quantum key distribution and other quantum communication technologies, PQC can generally be implemented using existing digital infrastructure. This compatibility makes PQC the most practical and scalable solution currently available for mitigating quantum-related cybersecurity risks.

The objective of PQC is not to eliminate quantum risk entirely but rather to replace vulnerable cryptographic mechanisms with alternatives based on mathematical problems that remain resistant to known quantum algorithms (Chen et al., 2016).

Consequently, PQC has become the preferred mitigation strategy among governments, standards organisations, and cybersecurity agencies worldwide.

5.3.2 NIST Standardisation

A major milestone in the development of post-quantum cryptography was the standardisation programme led by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

Following a multi-year international evaluation process involving extensive academic review and cryptographic analysis, NIST selected several algorithms for standardisation and deployment.

In 2024, NIST formally approved the first Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) for post-quantum cryptography, including:

• CRYSTALS-Kyber (key encapsulation)

• CRYSTALS-Dilithium (digital signatures)

• FALCON (digital signatures)

• SPHINCS+ (stateless hash-based signatures)

(NIST, 2024)

These standards represent a significant step towards global cryptographic migration and provide organisations with a practical foundation for quantum-resistant security architectures.

The importance of this development extends beyond technical implementation. Standardisation reduces uncertainty, promotes interoperability, and enables coordinated migration across industries and jurisdictions.

5.3.3 Strengths and Limitations of PQC

Although post-quantum cryptography currently represents the most credible defence against future quantum attacks, it is not without limitations.

One of its principal strengths is deployability. Unlike many quantum technologies, PQC can be implemented using existing computing infrastructure without requiring specialised quantum hardware.

Furthermore, the algorithms selected through the NIST process have undergone extensive public scrutiny and cryptanalytic evaluation, increasing confidence in their security properties.

However, several challenges remain.

First, post-quantum algorithms often require larger key sizes and signature lengths than traditional cryptographic systems. This can increase storage, communication, and computational requirements.

Second, cryptographic confidence develops over time. RSA and ECC have benefited from decades of analysis and real-world testing. Post-quantum algorithms, although extensively reviewed, have a comparatively shorter operational history.

Third, future advances in mathematics or quantum algorithms could potentially affect current security assumptions. Consequently, post-quantum cryptography should be viewed as an evolving security framework rather than a permanent solution.

These limitations highlight the importance of maintaining cryptographic agility rather than assuming that any single algorithm will remain secure indefinitely.

5.4 Financial Sector Readiness

5.4.1 Current State of Preparedness

Despite increasing awareness of quantum-related risks, evidence suggests that many organisations remain at relatively early stages of quantum preparedness.

Large financial institutions have generally demonstrated greater progress due to their extensive cybersecurity resources, regulatory obligations, and strategic technology programmes. Several global banks have initiated cryptographic inventory projects, conducted quantum risk assessments, and participated in industry working groups.

However, preparedness across the broader financial sector remains uneven.

Many institutions continue to face challenges in identifying cryptographic dependencies across legacy systems, third-party providers, cloud environments, and operational technology infrastructure. In some cases, organisations lack comprehensive visibility regarding where vulnerable cryptographic mechanisms are deployed.

This creates a significant obstacle because effective migration cannot occur until cryptographic assets are identified and prioritised.

5.4.2 Cryptographic Agility

One of the most important concepts in quantum preparedness is cryptographic agility.

Cryptographic agility refers to an organisation's ability to replace, update, or modify cryptographic algorithms without requiring extensive redesign of underlying systems. Such agility is considered essential for implementing hybrid cryptographic strategies and managing uncertainty during the migration towards post-quantum security (Dowling et al., 2020).

Historically, many systems were developed with cryptographic mechanisms deeply embedded within software architectures. As a result, replacing algorithms can require substantial redevelopment efforts.

Organisations possessing high levels of cryptographic agility are likely to experience smoother transitions towards post-quantum security. Conversely, institutions with inflexible legacy environments may encounter significant implementation challenges.

Consequently, cryptographic agility has increasingly become a key indicator of organisational readiness.

5.4.3 Third-Party and Supply Chain Dependencies

A frequently overlooked aspect of quantum preparedness concerns third-party dependencies.

Modern financial institutions rely extensively on technology vendors, cloud service providers, payment networks, software suppliers, and external infrastructure providers. Vulnerabilities within any component of this ecosystem may introduce risk throughout the broader organisation.

Consequently, quantum readiness cannot be assessed solely at the organisational level. Effective preparedness requires evaluation of the entire technological supply chain.

This challenge is particularly important because cryptographic migration will require coordinated action across multiple organisations, jurisdictions, and regulatory environments.

5.5 Regulatory and Industry Responses

Regulators have increasingly recognised quantum computing as a strategic cybersecurity issue.

Authorities including NIST, the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, and national cybersecurity agencies have encouraged organisations to begin preparing for quantum-related risks.

The regulatory emphasis has generally focused on three priorities:

1. Cryptographic inventory and discovery.

2. Development of migration roadmaps.

3. Adoption of cryptographic agility principles.

Importantly, regulators have not generally advocated immediate replacement of all existing cryptography. Instead, many organisations are expected to adopt hybrid cryptographic approaches that combine conventional and post-quantum algorithms during transition periods, thereby reducing migration risk while maintaining interoperability with existing systems (Dowling et al., 2020).

This reflects recognition that cryptographic transformation is a multi-year process requiring extensive coordination and governance.

5.6 Strategic Readiness Beyond Cryptography

Although post-quantum cryptography represents the primary technical response to quantum threats, organisational readiness extends beyond algorithm replacement.

Financial institutions must also develop capabilities in:

• Quantum risk governance

• Workforce education and awareness

• Technology monitoring

• Strategic planning

• Vendor assessment

• Regulatory engagement

Boards and senior executives increasingly face decisions regarding investment priorities under conditions of significant uncertainty. Effective governance therefore requires balancing immediate cybersecurity needs against longer-term technological developments.

Institutions that treat quantum preparedness solely as a technical cybersecurity issue may underestimate its broader strategic implications.

Accordingly, readiness should be viewed as an organisational capability encompassing technology, governance, risk management, and strategic planning.

5.7 Critical Evaluation of Financial Readiness

A critical assessment of current preparedness reveals a paradox.

Awareness of quantum-related risks has increased substantially, and the development of post-quantum cryptographic standards represents a major achievement in global cybersecurity coordination. However, widespread implementation remains at an early stage.

The challenge facing financial institutions is not a lack of available solutions but the complexity of deploying those solutions across large and interconnected technological environments.

Furthermore, the uncertainty surrounding quantum timelines creates incentives for delay. Because practical quantum attacks have not yet materialised, organisations may be tempted to defer investment in migration initiatives.

This creates a potential collective-action problem. Institutions that postpone preparation may expose themselves to greater future costs, while those that act early may incur significant short-term expenditure without immediate benefits.

Nevertheless, the evidence increasingly suggests that preparedness should not be viewed as optional. Given the long implementation timelines associated with cryptographic transformation, organisations that delay migration may ultimately face elevated operational and security risks.

Consequently, the most important determinant of future resilience may not be technological sophistication but organisational readiness and execution capability.

5.8 Chapter Summary

Post-quantum cryptography has emerged as the principal mechanism through which financial institutions can address the cybersecurity risks associated with quantum computing. Recent standardisation efforts have provided practical pathways for migration, while increasing regulatory attention has elevated quantum preparedness as a strategic priority across the financial sector.

However, successful adaptation requires more than the adoption of new cryptographic algorithms. Financial institutions must develop cryptographic agility, strengthen governance frameworks, assess third-party dependencies, and establish long-term migration strategies capable of operating under conditions of uncertainty.

The evidence suggests that quantum readiness is fundamentally an organisational challenge rather than a purely technical one. Institutions that begin preparing early are likely to be better positioned to manage both the risks and opportunities associated with future quantum developments.

The following chapter considers the longer-term outlook for quantum computing and evaluates how the interaction between technological progress, cybersecurity adaptation, and financial innovation may shape the future evolution of the industry.

6. Future Outlook

6.1 Introduction

Forecasting the future development of quantum computing presents significant challenges due to the complex interaction between scientific discovery, engineering progress, economic incentives, regulatory responses, and organisational adoption. Unlike many emerging technologies, quantum computing is characterised by substantial uncertainty regarding both technological timelines and practical commercial outcomes. Consequently, assessments of future impact must balance optimism regarding recent advances with recognition of the considerable challenges that remain.

Despite these uncertainties, several trends have become increasingly visible. Advances in quantum error correction, logical qubits, fault-tolerant architectures, and algorithm development suggest that quantum computing is progressing from a primarily experimental discipline towards a more mature technological ecosystem. At the same time, governments, technology firms, and financial institutions have begun preparing for the long-term implications of quantum technologies through investment, research partnerships, and cybersecurity initiatives.

This chapter evaluates the likely future trajectory of quantum computing and considers its implications for the financial services industry. Particular attention is given to expected technological developments, timelines for adoption, the evolving role of post-quantum cryptography, and the strategic challenges facing financial institutions.

6.2 The Future Trajectory of Quantum Computing

6.2.1 From NISQ Systems to Fault-Tolerant Computing

The most important determinant of quantum computing's future impact will be the transition from Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) systems to fault-tolerant quantum computers.

Current quantum processors remain constrained by noise, limited coherence times, imperfect gate fidelities, and substantial error-correction overhead. Although recent advances have demonstrated logical qubits and below-threshold error correction, existing systems remain far from the scale required for many commercially significant applications.

The next decade is therefore likely to be dominated by efforts to improve:

• Logical qubit fidelity

• Error correction efficiency

• Hardware scalability

• Interconnect architectures

• Resource management

Recent achievements by Google Quantum AI, IBM, Quantinuum, and neutral-atom research groups suggest that fault-tolerant quantum computing is increasingly viewed as an engineering challenge rather than a purely scientific one. However, the scale of that challenge remains substantial.

Most projections indicate that practical fault-tolerant systems capable of delivering sustained commercial quantum advantage will require orders-of-magnitude improvements beyond current capabilities. Consequently, progress is expected to be evolutionary rather than revolutionary.

6.2.2 Hardware Competition and Technological Diversity

The future quantum landscape is unlikely to be dominated by a single hardware platform.

Superconducting, trapped-ion, neutral-atom, photonic, and topological approaches each possess distinct advantages and limitations. Current evidence suggests that multiple architectures may coexist, with different platforms proving optimal for different applications.

This situation resembles the early development of classical computing, where competing architectures coexisted for extended periods before industry standards emerged.

Consequently, predictions regarding future winners should be approached cautiously. While some technologies currently appear more mature, the history of technological innovation demonstrates that early leadership does not necessarily guarantee long-term dominance.

For financial institutions, this uncertainty reinforces the importance of maintaining platform-independent quantum strategies rather than committing prematurely to specific technological ecosystems.

6.2.3 The Evolution of Quantum Software

Significant advances are also expected within the quantum software ecosystem.

Historically, improvements in classical computing have often been driven as much by software innovation as by hardware development. Quantum computing is likely to follow a similar pattern.

Future progress is expected in:

• Quantum programming languages

• Compiler optimisation

• Error mitigation techniques

• Hybrid quantum-classical workflows

• Algorithm design

Importantly, algorithmic breakthroughs may prove as significant as hardware advances. Historical experience demonstrates that improvements in algorithms can dramatically reduce computational requirements, potentially accelerating practical adoption even in the absence of major hardware breakthroughs.

Consequently, future assessments of quantum capability should consider software progress alongside hardware metrics.

6.3 Quantum Computing and the Future of Financial Services

6.3.1 Near-Term Outlook (2026–2030)

Over the remainder of this decade, the most significant impact of quantum computing on financial services is likely to occur through cybersecurity rather than computational transformation.

Financial institutions are expected to prioritise:

• Cryptographic inventory projects

• Post-quantum cryptographic migration

• Quantum risk assessment

• Governance development

• Workforce education

During this period, quantum computing is likely to remain primarily experimental from a computational perspective. Pilot projects and proof-of-concept initiatives may continue, but widespread operational deployment is expected to remain limited.

Hybrid quantum-classical applications may begin to emerge in selected areas such as optimisation and risk modelling. However, these deployments are likely to be narrow in scope and carefully controlled.

Consequently, the near-term outlook is best characterised as one of preparation rather than transformation.

6.3.2 Medium-Term Outlook (2030–2035)

The period between 2030 and 2035 may represent an important transitional phase.

Assuming continued progress in quantum error correction and scalability, financial institutions may begin to observe early instances of quantum advantage within highly specialised applications.

Potential areas include:

• Portfolio optimisation

• Liquidity management

• Capital allocation

• Scenario analysis

• Monte Carlo simulation

However, these applications are unlikely to replace existing systems entirely. Instead, quantum processors are expected to function as specialised accelerators integrated within broader computational environments.

During this phase, institutions that have invested in quantum capability development may possess advantages in terms of expertise, partnerships, and organisational readiness.

Nevertheless, widespread industry transformation is unlikely to occur uniformly. Adoption rates will depend heavily on cost, demonstrated value, regulatory acceptance, and technological maturity.

6.3.3 Long-Term Outlook (Beyond 2035)

Beyond 2035, the potential implications become increasingly difficult to predict.

If fault-tolerant quantum computers achieve the scale anticipated by current theoretical models, significant opportunities may emerge across optimisation, simulation, machine learning, and financial analytics.

Potential developments include:

• Large-scale portfolio optimisation

• Real-time risk modelling

• Advanced derivatives pricing

• Quantum-enhanced scenario analysis

• High-dimensional financial simulations

At the same time, the broader computational ecosystem is likely to continue evolving. Advances in artificial intelligence, high-performance computing, specialised accelerators, and classical optimisation methods may reduce or alter the relative advantage of quantum systems.

Consequently, the future role of quantum computing should not be viewed in isolation. Its ultimate impact will depend on competition and complementarity with other emerging technologies.

6.4 The Future of Cybersecurity and Post-Quantum Migration

The most certain future development associated with quantum computing is the continued transition towards post-quantum cryptography.

Unlike many proposed quantum applications, cryptographic migration is already underway. Governments, standards bodies, and financial institutions have begun implementing strategies designed to reduce long-term exposure to quantum-related cybersecurity risks.

Over the next decade, post-quantum cryptography is expected to become a standard component of financial infrastructure, with hybrid deployment models likely to play an important role during the transitional period as organisations gradually phase out vulnerable algorithms (Dowling et al., 2020).

Importantly, post-quantum cryptography should not be viewed as the final stage of cybersecurity evolution. Future developments in cryptanalysis, mathematics, and computing may create new vulnerabilities requiring further adaptation.

Accordingly, the long-term lesson of quantum preparedness is not simply the adoption of new algorithms but the development of organisational capabilities capable of responding to future technological disruptions.

6.5 Strategic Implications for Financial Institutions

The future quantum landscape suggests that financial institutions must pursue a dual strategic approach.

The first dimension involves risk mitigation. Organisations must continue preparing for quantum-related cybersecurity threats through cryptographic migration, governance enhancement, and operational resilience initiatives.

The second dimension involves capability development. Institutions that develop expertise in quantum technologies, establish research partnerships, and engage in pilot experimentation may be better positioned to exploit future opportunities as the technology matures.

Importantly, neither excessive optimism nor excessive scepticism is likely to be beneficial.

Organisations that overinvest based on unrealistic expectations may incur significant costs without corresponding benefits. Conversely, institutions that ignore quantum developments risk falling behind competitors and facing increased transition challenges in the future.

The most effective strategy is therefore likely to involve staged investment, continuous monitoring, and adaptive decision-making under uncertainty.

6.6 Critical Evaluation of Future Scenarios

A critical assessment of the available evidence suggests that the future of quantum computing is best understood as an extended transition rather than a singular technological revolution.

Public discourse frequently portrays quantum computing as either an imminent disruptive force or an overhyped technology unlikely to fulfil its promises. The evidence supports neither extreme position.

Recent advances in error correction and logical qubits have strengthened confidence that large-scale quantum computing is scientifically achievable. However, substantial engineering challenges remain, and the timeline for widespread commercial adoption continues to be uncertain.

Furthermore, many discussions focus exclusively on computational opportunities while underestimating the significance of cybersecurity adaptation. In practice, the first major transformation associated with quantum computing is likely to be defensive rather than productive.

This distinction is particularly important for financial institutions. The most immediate consequence of quantum computing may not be superior portfolio optimisation or faster derivatives pricing, but rather the extensive organisational effort required to secure existing infrastructure against future quantum threats.

Accordingly, the future quantum landscape is likely to be characterised by gradual adaptation, selective adoption, and uneven implementation rather than sudden disruption.

6.7 Chapter Summary

The future of quantum computing is characterised by both significant potential and substantial uncertainty. Continued advances in hardware, software, and error correction are expected to move the field progressively towards fault-tolerant quantum computation, although major engineering challenges remain.

For financial institutions, the future is likely to unfold through a dual-phase transformation. The first phase, already underway, centres on cybersecurity adaptation through post-quantum cryptography and quantum risk management. The second phase, expected to emerge more gradually, involves the integration of quantum-enhanced computational capabilities into selected financial applications.

The evidence suggests that quantum computing will not transform financial services through a single disruptive event. Instead, its influence is likely to emerge through a prolonged period of technological maturation, organisational adaptation, and strategic adjustment. Institutions that combine effective risk management with measured capability development are likely to be best positioned to navigate the opportunities and challenges of the quantum era.

7. Conclusion

7.1 Introduction

This study set out to examine the current state of quantum computing and evaluate its potential implications for the financial services industry. The research was motivated by growing interest in quantum technologies and the increasing recognition that quantum computing may simultaneously create significant opportunities and substantial risks for financial institutions. By critically reviewing developments in quantum hardware, software, algorithms, cybersecurity, and post-quantum cryptography, the study sought to assess both the technological reality of quantum computing and its likely impact on financial services over the coming decades.

7.2 Summary of Findings

The findings indicate that quantum computing has progressed considerably beyond its theoretical origins and is now entering an important stage of technological maturation. Recent advances in logical qubits, quantum error correction, and fault-tolerant architectures have strengthened confidence that large-scale quantum computing is scientifically achievable. Nevertheless, substantial engineering challenges remain, and current systems continue to operate within the constraints of the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era.

The study identified several areas within financial services where quantum computing may eventually provide meaningful computational advantages. Portfolio optimisation, derivatives pricing, Monte Carlo simulation, and risk management emerged as the most promising applications due to the strong theoretical foundations supporting quantum advantage in optimisation and simulation tasks. Quantum machine learning, fraud detection, and predictive analytics also demonstrate potential, although current evidence remains comparatively limited and many proposed benefits remain speculative.

At the same time, the research found that the risks associated with quantum computing are likely to emerge earlier and with greater certainty than many of its proposed computational benefits. The most significant threat concerns the vulnerability of contemporary public-key cryptographic systems, including RSA and elliptic curve cryptography, to future quantum attacks. Given the extensive reliance of financial institutions on cryptographic security, this challenge extends beyond individual organisations and has implications for financial infrastructure, operational resilience, and systemic stability.

The study further found that post-quantum cryptography currently represents the most practical and widely supported response to these risks. International standardisation initiatives, particularly those led by NIST, have established a foundation for cryptographic migration. However, successful implementation will require substantial organisational effort, including cryptographic discovery, infrastructure modernisation, governance development, and long-term strategic planning.

7.3 Answering the Research Question

The central research question guiding this study was:

How is quantum computing likely to affect the financial services industry over the coming decades?

The evidence suggests that quantum computing will influence the financial services industry through two distinct but interconnected pathways.

First, quantum computing will drive a significant cybersecurity transformation as financial institutions migrate towards post-quantum cryptographic systems. This transition is already underway and represents the most immediate and strategically important consequence of quantum technological development. The requirement to secure financial infrastructure against future quantum threats will influence investment decisions, regulatory frameworks, technology strategies, and operational risk management for many years before large-scale quantum computers become commercially viable.

Second, as fault-tolerant quantum systems mature, quantum computing may gradually enhance computational capabilities within selected areas of finance. Applications involving optimisation, simulation, and complex probabilistic modelling appear most likely to benefit from future quantum advances. However, these benefits are expected to emerge incrementally rather than through sudden technological disruption.

Accordingly, the impact of quantum computing on finance is likely to be evolutionary rather than revolutionary. The technology should be viewed neither as an immediate solution to existing computational challenges nor as a distant speculative concept, but rather as an emerging capability whose influence will develop over an extended period of technological and organisational adaptation.

7.4 Implications for Financial Institutions

The findings of this study carry several important implications for financial institutions.

First, organisations should regard quantum preparedness primarily as a strategic risk-management challenge rather than a technology-adoption initiative. While the computational opportunities associated with quantum computing remain largely prospective, the cybersecurity risks require immediate attention due to the long timescales involved in cryptographic migration.

Second, financial institutions should prioritise the development of cryptographic agility, quantum risk governance, and organisational readiness. These capabilities are likely to prove more valuable in the near term than substantial investments in experimental quantum applications.

Third, institutions should continue monitoring developments in quantum computing while pursuing targeted capability development through pilot projects, partnerships, and workforce education. Such initiatives can provide valuable strategic optionality without requiring premature commitment to uncertain technological outcomes.

7.5 Limitations of the Study

Several limitations should be acknowledged.

First, quantum computing remains a rapidly evolving field, and technological developments occurring after the completion of this study may alter current assessments regarding timelines, capabilities, and commercial viability. Second, many proposed financial applications have not yet been tested at commercially relevant scales, limiting the availability of empirical evidence regarding practical quantum advantage. Third, the study relies primarily on secondary academic and industry sources rather than primary experimental research or organisational case studies.

Consequently, while the findings provide an informed assessment of current trends and future possibilities, they should be interpreted within the context of ongoing technological uncertainty.

7.6 Recommendations for Future Research

Future research should focus on evaluating quantum applications under realistic financial conditions as hardware capabilities continue to improve. Particular attention should be given to portfolio optimisation, risk modelling, derivatives pricing, and hybrid quantum-classical architectures, where practical benefits appear most plausible.

Further investigation is also required into organisational preparedness, regulatory responses, and the economic implications of large-scale post-quantum cryptographic migration. As quantum technologies mature, empirical studies examining adoption patterns within financial institutions will become increasingly valuable.

7.7 Final Conclusion

Quantum computing represents one of the most important emerging technologies facing the financial services industry. Although substantial uncertainty remains regarding the pace of future development, recent advances have increased confidence that fault-tolerant quantum computing is ultimately achievable. The technology therefore warrants serious attention from financial institutions, regulators, and policymakers.

However, the study demonstrates that the first major impact of quantum computing on finance is unlikely to arise from revolutionary computational capabilities. Instead, it will emerge through the extensive cybersecurity transformation required to protect financial infrastructure against future quantum threats. Only after this transition has been successfully navigated are the broader computational opportunities of quantum computing likely to be realised.

The future of quantum computing in finance should therefore be understood as a process of gradual adaptation rather than sudden disruption. Institutions that successfully balance risk mitigation, technological preparedness, and strategic capability development will be best positioned to benefit from the opportunities of quantum computing while maintaining resilience against its associated risks.

8. References

Acharya, R. et al. (2024) 'Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold', Nature, 638, pp. 920–926.

Babbush, R., Berry, D.W., Kivlichan, I.D., Wei, A.Y., Love, P.J. and Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2021) ‘Exponential quantum speedup in simulating coupled classical oscillators’, Physical Review X, 11(4), 041041.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2019) Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2023) Principles for operational resilience and cyber risk management. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.

Bharti, K. et al. (2022) ‘Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(1), 015004.

Biamonte, J. et al. (2017) ‘Quantum machine learning’, Nature, 549(7671), pp. 195–202.

Bouland, A., Fefferman, B., Nirkhe, C. and Vazirani, U. (2020) ‘On the complexity and verification of quantum computation’, Nature Physics, 15, pp. 159–163.

Brassard, G., Høyer, P., Mosca, M. and Tapp, A. (2000) ‘Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation’, Contemporary Mathematics, 305, pp. 53–74.

Brock, B.L. et al. (2025) ‘Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even’, Nature, 641, pp. 521–527.

Chen, L., Jordan, S., Liu, Y.K., Moody, D., Peralta, R., Perlner, R. and Smith-Tone, D. (2016) Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography. NISTIR 8105. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.

Diffie, W. and Hellman, M. (1976) ‘New directions in cryptography’, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22(6), pp. 644–654.

Dowling, B. et al., 2020 ‘Many a Mickle Makes a Muckle: A Framework for Provably Quantum-Secure Hybrid Key Exchange’

Egger, D.J., Gambella, C., Marecek, J., McFaddin, S., Mevissen, M., Raymond, R. and Woerner, S. (2020) ‘Quantum computing for finance: State-of-the-art and future prospects’, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 1, pp. 1–24.

European Securities and Markets Authority (2026) Quantum Computing in Financial Markets: Applications, Investments and Prospects. Paris: ESMA.

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) (2024) Post-Quantum Cryptography: Current State and Quantum Migration Planning.

Farhi, E., Goldstone, J. and Gutmann, S. (2014) ‘A quantum approximate optimisation algorithm’, arXiv:1411.4028.

Gidney, C. and Ekerå, M. (2021) ‘How to factor 2048-bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits’, Quantum, 5, 433.

Google Quantum AI et al. (2025) ‘Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold’, Nature, 638, pp. 920–926.

Grover, L.K. (1996) 'A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search', Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 212–219.

Havlíček, V. et al. (2019) ‘Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces’, Nature, 567(7747), pp. 209–212.

IBM (2025) IBM Quantum Roadmap. Armonk, NY: IBM Research.

Lukin, M.D. et al. (2025) ‘Low-overhead transversal fault tolerance for universal quantum computation’, Nature, 646, pp. 303–308.

Markowitz, H. (1952) ‘Portfolio selection’, The Journal of Finance, 7(1), pp. 77–91.

Montanaro, A. (2017) ‘Quantum speedup of Monte Carlo methods’, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 471(2181), 20150301.

Mosca, M. (2018) ‘Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: Will we be ready?’, IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(5), pp. 38–41.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2019) Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2024) Announcing Approval of Three Federal Information Processing Standards for Post-Quantum Cryptography. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Available at: NIST website.

Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L. (2010) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gong, H., Sedai, A., Schroeder, T. and Medda, F. (2026) ‘Quantum Computing for Financial Transformation: A Review of Optimisation, Pricing, Risk, Machine Learning, and Post-Quantum Security’, working paper, arXiv.

Orús, R., Mugel, S. and Lizaso, E. (2019) 'Quantum computing for finance: Overview and prospects', Reviews in Physics, 4, 100028.

Preskill, J. (2018) 'Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond', Quantum, 2, 79.

Rivest, R.L., Shamir, A. and Adleman, L. (1978) ‘A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems’, Communications of the ACM, 21(2), pp. 120–126.

Schuld, M. and Petruccione, F. (2021) Machine Learning with Quantum Computers. 2nd edn. Cham: Springer.

Shor, P.W. (1994) 'Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring', Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 124–134.

Venturelli, D. and Kondratyev, A. (2019) ‘Reverse quantum annealing approach to portfolio optimisation problems’, Quantum Machine Intelligence, 1, pp. 17–30.

Woerner, S. and Egger, D.J. (2019) ‘Quantum risk analysis', npj Quantum Information, 5(1), 15.

Zhou, J. (2025) ‘Quantum Finance: Exploring the Implications of Quantum Computing on Financial Models’

Contact

Reach out via email for inquiries.

Email

Subscribe to newsletter

info@grcadvisory.ch

© 2025. All rights reserved.